Keeping up with the changes in information technology is difficult for most adults unless they dedicate an unusually large percentage of their time to the process. In an ideal world we would want to use the same IT tools at school as parents had in their work places and students had at home. We are failing to do this at the moment. We use Windows 98 and Microsoft Office 97. It is unlikely that many of our students will be using these versions of this software at home. I have kept to these versions of the software in my home so I will be familiar with the versions the students are using. I cannot afford to do so any more as there are features, in later versions, that I need - for example the support that Windows provides for the use of digital cameras or music.
We have not kept up-to-date with Microsoft products because we cannot afford to do so. We knew years ago that to plan effectively we needed to know what we would be spending on Information technology a number of years ahead. We still do not know and I suspect will continue not to do so.
For this reason alone we need to move to Open Source software. There are other reasons. It is not only the cost of licenses that is causing us problems. There are also the support costs. Open Source software has a community of users who support each other away from the financial business model. Put simply is this not more in keeping with the way we work than Microsoft business practices? Another reason, in many cases the software is actually better, more in tune with the way you as a user interact with the software. The majority of people use the browser Microsoft Internet Explorer, they do so not because it is better, in fact there is little doubt it is inferior to other browsers, but because it is on their machine when they bought it. If there are features that you need in Open Source software that are not in the present version of the software you can add them to a list of requested features. It is likely that these features will appear in the next version. If they are critical to a project then you can pay someone to produce the feature.
This will be the last year that we teach Microsoft Office to students. We will use an Open Source equivalent such as Star Office. Some staff and students are already using this software. It may be that we provide each student with a CD containing this software, instructions on how to install it and a support service to ensure that they have a working copy of the software at home.
Our Microsoft exchange server software is in need of up dating and more licences are required. This again will be the last year that we use this software. The move to an Open Source equivalent SUse SLOX (On line demo), in the short term will not make a significant difference to staff as they can continue to use the Microsoft Outlook client software but we will not be up-dating this software in the future. The Open Source equivalent is web access and is significantly different. The migration to this software can start in November, by staff who want to make this change earlier rather than later this year and a timetable for migration can be worked out.
As a team we have adopted and made extensive use of email. In my opinion we are now over using it to a considerable degree. We must encourage people to find information.
Our web site then becomes the menu for a variety of different types of web content some would be Intranet, some Extranet and the rest Internet. We would need softeware to tie these elements together possibley Post Nuke Content Management System One of the tools that would help us achieve an effective Intranet is a weblog. The features that make a weblog a great application for this job are:
Not everyone thinks weblogs are good thing
For content that is static and requires more than one author there is open source software that we could be using - a Wiki. The uses of a Wiki are:
We will be using software to manage courses where students enrol, access course material and submit work electronically we have been using within science for some time. The danger that we have been aware of since the start is that many departments will require this type of software in the future and that it would be better to standardise on one type. Students should not be expected to become familiar with a variety of different interfaces for one purpose. The cost of the software our science team was using multiplied a few times would have caused us problems. There is an Open Source alternative Moodle Course Management SystemMoodle that has considerable support and could become very important in the not so far future. A description of the features of this type of software is not that useful, it is probably better to have a look at the Moodle demo course to see how we might use this type of software in the future.
The City Learning Centre has introduced and developed, extremely successfully, some Open Source Help desk software that other schools and we are now using. Its introduction appeared to be painless and the benefits considerable. We were not so successful with our library software – ALICE – it failed to do the task and the Open Source equivalent was too difficult to migrate to.
We must have a system to so students are availabe to transfer files between home and school, this was part of the design for the CLC. Mimerdesk was to be the Open Source solution but we are told it is not in a form at the moment that we are able to use. A later version will hopefully allow us to make this step. It would be nice to point to a list of schools that have made the steps that I have described above. I have not found such a list, but I have found many examples of schools that have implemented one or more of the things that I have suggested. I frequently came across North Chadderton school that is close to home and a look at their web presence shows that they are doing a lot more than having a school web site. What's new at North Chadderton There is a conference coming up! The
Open Source Software Conference
Posted by mikec at August 31, 2003 09:45 PM
Very interesting read, if ending a little weakly. I would suggest mentioning Mozilla Thunderbird, an open source cross platform email client very similar functionally to Outlook Express and includes a very easy to use migration tool.
The only thing that it lacks is the full PIM available with outlook, but these are available with other programs (Mr Project etc)
Another suggestion would be to have a look at the writings of Eric S Raymond, head of the Open Source Initiative, author and master hacker (in the actual sense of the term). His website is:
His writings page is:
However I suggest that you steer clear of his politics page, as he's a genuine Anarcho - Libertarian, he tends to be a little scarey :)
Regards,
Ben
Posted by: BenH at September 1, 2003 03:24 PMWhile I remember,this is an overview of the future of the IT industry from the perspective of a UNIX server company, rather than a pure Linux/Open Source company. Very detailed:
Regards,
Ben
Posted by: BenH Again at September 1, 2003 03:29 PMDamn, sorry didnt realise it posts responses as pure HTML rather than flat text. The links are in order:
http://catb.org/~esr/
http://catb.org/~esr/writings/
http://www.aaxnet.com/editor/edit029.html
Regards,
Ben
Posted by: BenH at September 1, 2003 03:31 PMThanks for your suggestion. I ended on negatives and just stopped writing! I have added a last paragraph on North Chadderton who seem to be doing a lot in this area.
Posted by: Mike Chapman at September 1, 2003 06:55 PM